Saturday, 17 January 2009

Whois fair game?

Ok … before we get started … I just wanted to say that life has taught me .. so far anyway … that there are a few very special relationships that should be protected above all else. These relationships are so close that they should be preserved, nurtured and never risked for the sake of love.

These relationships are more close than the "one degree of separation" between any two people that know each other (popularized by that book/movie) so I call them a half a degree. There are 3 types (oh and how us geeks love bullet points);

  1. Family – this means siblings, parents and children. Not in-laws, not cousins … these are all “just” friends.
  2. Exes – pretty self-explanatory, no? If not, these are people you were Sober.Pashing once.
  3. Flatmates – people you live with … but aren’t shagging … right? And only current ones. Old flatty’s drop back to being “just” friends once you move apart.
Now, being pessimistic and assuming … as unfortunately in my life so far is always the case … that things will go to sh*t when you break up with your girlfriend … there is going to be some fallout … so you want to have the “luxury” of a clean break and not have to worry about the domino effect that your break-up might have.

So, when you’re thinking about getting “it” started with someone … and you’re wondering who should be on your radar … there is only one moral high-ground to take if you want to minimise fallout and that is to only chase the following …

Theory 1: Fair game is one and a half degrees of separation.

Look I really wanted to write 1½ and I even thought about writing 1.5 in the title but it looks more impressive ... more linguistically intelligent … to use words not numbers. I can fool people into thinking I’m a writer NOT a geek like that. But who am I going to fool!

Ok, back to the degrees of separation theory … so >1.5 … what does that mean? Well, basically it is how I try to live my life. It means friend of a friend is the only fair-game, or …

Friend + Friend = 1.0 +1.0 = 2.0 > 1.5 .......................... (1)

Of course it does mean that a friend's-ex's-sibling is also ok, or …

Friend + Ex + Family = 1.0 + 0.5 + 0.5 = 2.0 > 1.5 ........................ (2)

Bear with me … you can see from these two equations that yes the “degrees” are additive meaning 2 degrees of 1.0 equals 2.0 and 3 degrees of 0.5 equals 1.5.

You getting it?

Now, 1.5 degrees is morally “common” shall we say in that it is how most people behave. So this means sleeping with your friend's-ex's, your sibling's-friends or your ex's-sibling's-flatmates etc, or …

Friend + Ex = 1.0 + 0.5 = 1.5
Family + Friend = 0.5 + 1.0 = 1.5
Ex + Family + Flatmate = 0.5 + 0.5 + 0.5 = 1.5 ................ (3)

Now, I have heard of a few terms for people that are sleeping with a friend's-ex, and they are; “sperm-buddies” or “custard cousins” for guys and “sushi-sisters” for girls. But by my definition, that is at “best” 1.5, so not so cool. Unless of course you became friends after the event … or the two “events” in this case I guess … in which case there was no 1.0 friend relationship yet so it is all cool … if not just a little bit creepy.

1.0 is morally low shall we say because it means sleeping with a sibling's-ex, a flatmate's-sibling, an ex's-mother or sister (hmmm … that one sounds kind of cool for some reason) or a friend, or …

Family + Ex = 0.5 + 0.5 = 1.0
Flatmate + Family = 0.5 + 0.5 = 1.0
Ex + Family = 0.5 + 0.5 = 1.0
Friend = 1.0 ..................(4)

There are of course some substitution rules, so that a flatmate's-flatmate is still a flatmate (and is just 0.5) and a sibling's-sibling is either yourself (and Catholics just don’t do that) or still a sibling which is … errr … a Tasmanian thing. Don’t worry if this is getting confusing there is a picture at the end of this post.

0.5 is basically … illegal! It is like sleeping with an ex (which is of course like a dog eating it’s own vomit), sleeping with a sibling (which is actually illegal) or sleeping with a flatmate … which while most people think is cool (i.e. enough degrees) … I personally think you just don’t go there … you put them in the friend bin straight away … well at 0.5 degrees anyway … and happily become two trains in the night.

Ex = 0.5
Family = 0.5
Flatmate = 0.5 ......... (5)

Make sense?

Now get ready for the picture! It shows the relationship “options” closest to You! Red is bad, Green is good.

0.5 to 2.0 degrees of separation from You


So it’s pretty easy to see that the easiest path is through your friends! Friend of a Friend is 2.0 and a-ok and all others are 1.5 so at least that’s morally “common”. So get to it friends, set me up with YOUR friends!!!

Copyright © 2009.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

hmm... very interesting read. will have to put it into practice.

I'm trying to be less nerdy.

cheers, Noobhunter.

DrTim said...

Thanks Noobhunter.

I like your blog too! We should debate the nuances between nerd, geek and dork in a future post???

Also, check back (or subscribe) because I've got a few more topics to unload :)

Anonymous said...

The diagram at the bottom of the page looks awfully like a venn-gina... or am seeing things through purple-tinted geek-goggles?

Anonymous said...

Your theory 1 says 1.5 is fair game, but then you talk about >1.5, not clear if its your theory that 1.5 is ok, or other people's

Anonymous said...

Finally a way I can drunkenly (or soberly, but that doesnt happen too often) decide who is eligible to 'connect' with.

Nice work Dr Timmy!

N.

DrTim said...

In response to the comment about 1.5 or >1.5, I guess the rule-of-thumb is that 1.5 is 'common' moral ground and >1.5 (i.e. 2.0) is 'high' moral ground. 1.0 being 'low' moral ground.

I think 1.5 is fine in general but still a bit risky and I try to abide by 2.0 as it is completely safe ... whether Friend of a Friend or Friend's Ex's sister as per equation (2).

Dave K said...

Dude, dude. So if I sleep with more people my numbers go up, right?

DrTim said...

Well sort of. The network may expand but the degrees of separation to people will reduce.

It goes like this ...

If you shag someone and it doesn't last then they are now technically an Ex. Assuming you knew them already through your network of Flatmates, Friends, Siblings etc then they will drop from being say a Friend of a Friend (2.0 degrees) or a Friend's-Flatmate (1.5 degrees) to just being an Ex (0.5 degrees). Thus bringing any of their network in closer to you by anything from 0.5 to 1.5 degrees. This may or may not be a good thing because it a) might bring some people onto your radar at 1.5 degrees say, or, b) might qualify out some prospects because they become less than 1.5 degrees say.

But if you didn't know them at all (i.e. they were not in your network) then they go from being infinite degrees (ok so more like 6 degrees) to being 0.5 degrees but you add all their network into the fold. Their Friends would now be 1.5 degrees away. But really, what's the chances of a random pick up in the first place? And would they really introduce you to their friends or would they 'keep' you for themselves? How good was the shag? If it was THAT good then why would they be an Ex :)

Ron said...

ok I think this is a mess.
what if, as in normal situations, you become friends with a friend of a friend. That makes it not ok to sleep with them? Well unless you bang them on first contact doesn't that make it a bit tricky?
and anyway its more fun going for random girls you just dont know.

DrTim said...

Thanks for your comment Ron. It's basically a theory designed to preserve the relationship(s) that introduced you in the first place. So if your 'friend' who used to be a friend of a friend becomes your partner and it ends in tears there isn't too much of a ripple affect. Ok?

So you essentially have to remember the relationship(s) that introduced you in the first place and use that as a qualifier.

And yes, I agree that random girls are a much safer option but it's like 350 days to the next CES ...

PS. Keep an eye out for the next installment which I'll post tomorrow!!!